Judge Name: Andrew M Yep
School: Waukesha South High School
For a more complete paradigm:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oy5VoSyom9JBmP9_ZOZaaueGwxeaIIsfOfixl9Bs5mw/edit?usp=sharing

Experience
Yep was never a member of debate in high school. He was coerced into coaching debate. But has stuck with it since 2011. He does enjoy it. He usually a policy judge but on occasion does get absorbed into the LD and Public Forum realms. Yep is not up to date on Debate lingo. So be sure to explain things and go slow.


Philosophy
Yep has been called Policy, Stocks and Tabs. Thus he does not know exactly where he fits. Persuasion is important and is enhanced by clarity. He will take into consideration all things he understands in the round that are not dropped. Yep does not like it when a team kicks arguments unless there exist a contradiction a speaker cannot explain away. Personally Yep does not like spread. He prefers quality over quantity. If a speaker feels it is necessary to do a line by line analysis give it the time and do not speed over it.


Topicality - Yep is not against topicality. Words are important in the world. But Yep needs definitions, standards and voters. Also give examples of what plans work under the definition and what does not. This helps Yep figure out if there exist a Topicality violation.


Counterplans - Counterplans need to be clear. If the counterplan is not mutually exclusive then a net benefit must be clearly achieved.


Kritiks - Yep is not a philosophy major. Yep does not vote on these often. A speaker may use one but at the risk of Yep being very confused. Be sure to explain the link thoroughly and provide an alternative.


Disadvantages - If Yep misses the link he will be very confused. Clarity is a must. When a DA is introduced Yep firmly believes that minimally it should be linked and impacts discussed in the 1NC.


Structure of the Round and Speaking
Yep likes signposts and likes very clear and slow tags. Cross examinations are closed so that he can judge your organization and understanding of arguments which will reflect into speaker points. If a speaker turns into a parrot that will reflect poorly in speaker points.


Rebuttals
Speakers should summarize the round pull through their arguments. Weigh the round through magnitude, timeframe and probability. Yep likes probability he is a statistics teacher. Obviously certain percentages cannot always be given but we can use word like “certain” or “uncertain”. He enjoys it when speakers question the validity of studies and experiments. Analogies and examples are not only welcomed but encouraged.


Timing & Technology
Yep’s timer is final. He is a little slow in starting it. He tries to let a team know when he is starting it. He will on occasion tell you how much you have left. In regards to technology the prep time will only end when the portable storage device is physically removed from the port of entry and is one its way to the other team.