School: Stevens Point Area Senior High (WI)

Experience: I've got three years of high school debate experience, I'm the assistant coach of the SPASH debate team, and this is my second year judging.

I'm a tabs judge, I'll always vote off the flow, but I have a few preferences:

Topicality: Throughly explain your standards/voters. In round abuse will be more persuasive, but I'll definitely listen to potential abuse.
Kritiks: I'll default to a policy framework if none is presented, so I guess I'm a little biased against Kritiks, so having strong framework/ impact framing args is important. I also probably have a higher standard for alt solvency.


Impact calc/ framing the round is key. In the end I'll vote on anything, but you need to tell my why I'm signing my ballot.

Email me at dgord325@uwsp.edu if you have any questions